My photo
This is my photographer’s blog, for your consideration. I post some of my favorite shots here, usually along with some comments about how the photo was taken or post-processed. (Occasionally I have the vain thought that someone might like to read about that.)

If you like what you see here, feel free to check out my Flickr site and YouTube channel.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Stereo Cascades

IMG_5189_sml

IMG_5189+5191_stereo_mt_hood_01_sml

On a recent business trip to Mobile, Alabama, I was treated to a series of vistas that begged to be rendered in more than two dimensions. On the way east, my plane passed near Mount Hood, with Mount Saint Helens, Mount Rainier, etc. in the north background. On the way west, we viewed the other side of Mount Hood, with Mount Washington, etc. in the south background.

Accordingly, I took a series of quadruplet shots -- four photos taken in quick succession, forming several 3D stereo pairs. (The four shots are needed since you don't know until later what stereo separation will look best.)

To see the results, click on the images above. The first set shows the scenes in regular, flat 2D. The second set, when viewed with red-blue 3D glasses, shows the mountains in full stereo depth.

Of course, all this is just academic if you can't actually see the photos because you don't have red-blue 3D glasses. I have some sourcing information at the end of his blog entry, if you need it.

You may recognize the fact that technically, these are hyperstereo photographs since the separation between shots is more than the normal eye separation. The plane traveled about 350 feet between each exposure. When combined into a stereo pair, this allows the viewer to perceive distance separation in a scene that normally looks flat since the subjects are so far away.

One of the 3D pictures was not taken on the Mobile trip. In fact, it wasn't taken as a stereo pair at all. On my birthday in 2005, I was on the way back from a Cairo business trip. My seat was mid-plane, and I wondered about the collective gasps proceeding from the front of the plane, moving toward the back. I glanced out my window, and suddenly it became clear. We were flying just to the west of Mount Saint Helens, and it was sporting a picturesque plume of steam. My first thought was, "What a great birthday present, to see this!"

100_4573_4574_cp_sml

My second thought, a nanosecond later, was to photograph the scene. Grabbing my old point-and-shoot digital camera, I shot a series of photos as fast as the little electrons would move through the circuitry. Which was not very fast, given the older generation of digital camera. So, I wasn't even thinking in terms of 3D pairs. But later, I wondered if I could salvage a stereo view from the outtakes. The result was this (click on the image for a larger view):

100_4573+4574_stereo_mt_st_helens_01_edcp_sml

Although the stereo separation is a bit more than is normally comfortable, it's an interesting view to see the actual roundness of the crater rim, with the steam plume at the center point.

There is one more thing you might find interesting. As we flew past Mount Hood toward the west, I zoomed up on the top, with Mount Washington in the background (click on the images for bigger versions):

IMG_5207_sml

IMG_5207+5208_stereo_mt_hood_02_sml

As the vista unfolded, I shot fifteen photos in fairly quick succession. Later, I used that sequence to create a 3D video of the flyby. (Internet Explorer users: You will probably find the YouTube window below to be cut off on the right. If so, go here instead, and click on "HD" on the bottom of the YouTube window.)



For what it's worth! :-)

------------------

As promised, here is some sourcing information for 3D glasses. You can get two cardboard pairs for $1.00 here:

http://www.berezin.com/3d/

Specifically, the product to get (red-cyan) is:

http://www.berezin.com/shop/544C

With the shipping cost of $3.39, you might be tempted to get one of the fancier $6.95 ProView pairs, with rigid acrylic lenses -- but don't bother. My experience is that the fancy red lenses are not the right shade for computer screens. So, you're better off with the cheap cardboard variety. If you are in a hurry, rumor has it that some comic book stores sell red-blue glasses as well, but I have not verified that personally.

1 comment:

MJ said...

Wow, these are excellent!

Could you perhaps post the pairs with which you generated the images, so I could have a better idea of the separation?

Thanks!