Heron' There

One disadvantage of having a boss whose office is in a different building is that you have to walk five minutes to get to his location for staff meetings. But when you work for a company that has a pond in the middle of its campus, you sometimes encounter amazing wildlife along the way.

In this case, it was Blue Heron perched on the handrail of a picturesque walkway. Unfortunately, I did not have my DSLR with me, but I did have my handy iPhone. As I watched, he (she?) became distracted by a nearby goose call, and sprang away from the railing.



His/her destination was the pond grasses to the left in this photo:



Every once in awhile, I'm just blown away at the privilege of working amid such incredible surroundings! :-)

Half Moon, Halfway There

For the second attempt at astrophotography through my telescope, I shot 600 photos of the Moon in two pieces (1024x768 each), taken at 15fps using my new Orion imaging camera. When I first viewed the resulting photo streams as videos, I figured it was a failed attempt. Most of the time, the images are blurry, and air turbulence causes them to undulate and wave:

http://youtu.be/_an5BVe-Vlg?hd=1

But every once in awhile, there is a brief moment of image clarity. When I submitted the collection of photos to Registax, the software found that there are, in fact, 3 sharp frames in the lower half of the composite, and 7 sharp frames in the top half. I guess that 10 out of 600 total frames isn't bad, right? (I used Microsoft ICE to stitch the two halves together, for the whole Moon image.) Here is a full-res portion from the top half:



I figure I'm about halfway there; I'm still learning and adapting technique. For example, I think I would get a higher yield if the telescope is allowed to cool longer in the frigid Oregon "spring" air. Also, my equatorial telescope mount, although better than what I've had in the past, is not exactly high-end -- but I think maybe I can stabilize it better.

Even so, much to my surprise after viewing the blurry video, this turned out to be my best Moon image so far. And, there is much room for improvement despite having very modest equipment. If anyone cares, I'll be posting results from my continuing astrophotographic journey. :-)

First Light

If you hang around with anyone who does astrophotography, you'll recognize the term "First Light." This is an affectionate name for the image of the first "real" subject photographed with a new piece of equipment, after testing and calibration. The Moon photo above is the "First Light" image taken with my new telescopic camera -- for my birthday, Kathy gave me a telescope eyepiece imager.

This solves a problem I have been struggling with, i.e. how to connect my camera to the telescope. There are two options: 1) Placing the camera, sans lens, at the telescope's prime focus; 2) Placing the camera, with a normal lens, pointing into a regular telescope eyepiece. Unfortunately, #1 creates a small image with my telescope (not much better that what I could get with a regular telephoto); #2 requires near-perfect alignment, has vignetting, and focusing is very problematic. Both methods make it very difficult to aim the telescope since the camera is in the way, hindering normal eyepiece viewing.

Over the years, serious hobby astrophotographers have solved these problems with custom cameras designed for telescopes, connected to a computer via a data cable. Recently, quality telescope imagers have come down in price for mere mortal astrophotographers like me. Well, "quality" is relative of course. For $100, you can get a 1024 x 768 resolution sensor in a 5mm eyepiece, resulting in a magnification (for my telescope) of 100x or 200x -- enough to get me started on imaging objects in the solar system -- starting with the Moon.

First Light images are often lower quality than the eventual results from the new device. For example, the first Hubble Space Telescope images revealed a manufacturing flaw which eventually required a Shuttle mission to apply the telescopic equivalent of eyeglasses.

In my case also, the images will get better over time. For example, a night with a more stable atmosphere will help (better "seeing"), as will getting the hang of focusing using a computer screen. With my barlow lens, I'll be able to effectively double the resolution by getting in closer. Also, I need to experiment more with the imager controls, e.g. constrast, brightness, and gain. Then there is the post-processing -- learning the Registax interface better in order to best find the "good" frames and tweak the many stacking and wavelet parameters.

But for now, I can sit back and enjoy this inaugural photograph of Earth's closest neighbor, taken through my own telescope. :-)